Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:16

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are black people harassed more by police officers?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ferrari Reveals 296 GT3 Evo for 2026 Debut - Sportscar365
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is it like to be a Christian in Iran?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is the reason for The Acolyte (2024 series) having poor reception among Star Wars fans?